New York TImes Response

I saw where the author was coming from with this article, however it felt very one sided and repepative. I understand the importance of efficiency and a sense of urgency which is what the article covered (the main points and ideas), yet the points that were made did nothing to attempt to defend Ravi at all. Not that I am saying he deserves it, but thats because I had another source to make that conclusion, where as a person who just reads this would be more prone to spite Ravi with almost no knowledge of the real situation. The article also seemed to lack "a point", which is ironic. It seemed more like the article drew attention to this incident for attentions sake, not genuine concern to the severity of the tragedy.